Chesterton Tribune            adv:

 

Appeal challenges radio tower rejection

Back to Front Page

 

By PAULENE POPARAD

This morning The WBEZ Alliance, Inc. doing business as Chicago Public Radio and Aqua-Land Communications Inc. filed a lawsuit asking a court to overturn the Porter Board of Zoning Appeals’ Sept. 20 denial of a use variance, and to require the town to issue a building permit for a FM radio transmission tower on Aqua-Land’s property.

According to the office of local attorney Michael Harris, whose firm filed the appeal, the BZA has been given until Nov. 10 by Porter Superior Court Judge Roger Bradford to respond.

The appeal cites the fact that the BZA failed to adopt findings of fact related to the petition within five days from the Sept. 20 decision as required by law and therefore there was no legal basis on which the board made its decision. Those findings were adopted last night.

The appeal also alleges that the board “considered improper material and matters outside the record and the evidence presented at the hearing.” In addition, WBEZ and Aqua-Land alleged that BZA President Bruce Snyder should have recused himself from the case but instead did hold “himself out as an expert witness to his other board members, free from challenge or rebuttal by the applicant.”

Snyder is a certified land appraiser, and the lack of his disclosure regarding his affiliation with Fairhaven Church also was questioned in the appeal because it states 22 of 24 individuals signing a petition against the 499-foot radio tower reside in the Fairhaven complex on property owned by Fairhaven.

Furthermore, according to the lawsuit, citing extended remarks by Snyder prior to the vote, “All of the Chairman’s rationales were clearly outside the evidence presented and in fact had no relationship to the evidence presented.”

The petitioners presented convincing evidence why their variance should have been granted, according to the lawsuit, and WBEZ and Aqua-Land had obtained necessary federal permits to construct the tower.

A second count in the lawsuit alleges the petitioners have suffered economic losses and as such are entitled to have their damages assessed and a judgment entered in their favor and against the town and the BZA.

 

Posted 10/19/2006

 

 

Google
 
Web chestertontribune.com