Despite assurances by the petitioner that pawn dealers are now heavily
regulated to guard against unsavory elements, a number of residents voiced
strong objections Tuesday to a proposed pawn shop in their Brown Avenue
neighborhood.
The Chesterton Board of Zoning Appeals made no decision on a use variance
requested by Complete Control Systems, Inc., on the grounds that findings of
fact had not yet been prepared. The BZA did close the public hearing and
agreed to issue a decision and the findings at the Dec. 22 meeting.
The pawn shop is proposed for a vacant portion of the CCI building at 100
Brown Ave. The building now houses offices, leased storage space, and an
auto shop. Efforts to lease the vacant portion have been unsuccessful,
except for the interest shown by a pawn shop, said property manager Cheryl
Bonin.
Bonin, who presented the variance request on behalf of CCI owner Paul
Childress, said improvements have been made to the building and that more
renovations are planned, but that in order to pay for the enhancements, the
building needs to generate more revenue by leasing its quarters.
Bonin also said the building has been in existence since 1950 and was there
before most of the nearby houses. Because the property is zoned
Industrial-1, she said town code would already allow a number of other uses
that could be deemed less desirable than a pawn shop. She cited the
potential for an all-night night club and three-shift factory.
She also said that pawn shops now have to comply with many state and federal
regulations and that it’s not in the pawn shop owner’s interests to invest
money on the new business only to attract “ derelicts and low lifes.”
The neighbors, though, were hardly swayed.
When West Michigan Avenue resident Elva Pocock asked who else in the
audience opposed the pawn shop, more than 10 people stood up.
Pocock said her main concern is for the safety of the children in the
neighborhood, as she questioned if the pawn shop would buy and sell guns and
other weapons. Except for one business, the neighborhood is an entirely
residential one, she said. “They’re not the kind of clients we want in the
building,” she said of a pawn dealer.
Similarly, Terese Wilkie of Brown Court said she lives directly across the
street from where the pawn shop would be. She raised the potential that
patrons of the pawn shop might start looking in the windows of the nearby
houses, looking for goods to pawn. “That is a very scary thing to me,” she
said.
Beverly Yocom of Brown Avenue questioned what would happen to the property
values with a neighborhood pawn shop. If she were to fix up her house with
the hopes of selling it, she questioned if she could recoup her investment.
“No one wants to move in by a pawn shop,” she said.
Jean Hayes, a Brown Court resident, noted that a variance would be needed
because town code currently doesn’t include a classification for pawn shops.
If the town leaders feel that a pawn shop is needed in town, she suggested
that town officials look at the issue from a broader perspective, and zone
an area conducive for such a business.
In response, Bonin said the residents moved into the area knowing about the
industrial zoning. She also said that because of the heavy regulations, pawn
shops actually help deter crime. About one-half of one percent of the goods
at pawn shops turn out to be stolen, she said, and 90 percent of those come
from people stealing the goods from family members.
Criminals don’t go to pawn shops to shop, Bonin said. “The ones that do get
caught.”
After the public comments, BZA Chair Fred Owens took note of at least 12
letters submitted from town residents, several of whom spoke at Tuesday’s
public hearing, in opposition to the variance.
Though the BZA made no decision, some of the initial comments didn’t appear
favorable.
BZA member Jim Kowalski said the building is not unusable just because the
owner hasn’t yet been able to find a tenant. Having the space leased by a
pawn shop might be good for the owner, he said, but the BZA has the
responsibility to consider the impacts on others. “A good fit is what we’re
looking for,” he said.
BZA member Kim Goldak raised concerns about the current conditions at the
building, with a tarped roof, a large container filled with an unknown
substance, an old trash receptacle, old vehicles, and black mold on one
side. If there is a hardship that prompts the need for the variance, she
said “it’s almost like it’s a self-created hardship” due to the current
conditions.
BZA member Brandon Kroft also raised a concern about how the pawn shop might
impact the neighborhood, and said he thinks it’s a shame when businesses
don’t take good care of their property. But at the same time, he expressed
sympathy for Bonin, noting that she’s not the building owner or the
potential tenant, but has been given the job of making a “tough case.”
After some discussion about whether the BZA should make a decision on the
spot or wait until findings of fact are prepared, the BZA unanimously opted
for the latter. Kowalski said he wants to make sure that the BZA has all its
“ducks in a row” when making the decision in case there is an appeal. BZA
attorney Chuck Lukmann said the decision is ultimately up to the BZA, but
that he thinks it’s bad policy to make a decision on a variance without
first having findings prepared.
The BZA directed Lukmann to draw up findings that could be used when the BZA
issues its decision on Dec. 22.
Garage Approved
In another case Tuesday, the BZA approved the petition of Rodney and Kathi
Corder of 1357 N. County Road 100E, who requested a variance to reconstruct
a garage in their front yard after it was destroyed in the August 19
tornado. The variance is needed because accessory structures are not allowed
in front yards.
Rodney Corder told the BZA that the garage can’t be built elsewhere on the
property due to the heavily wooded area. He also said the garage is needed
to be rebuilt where it was in order to cover a shallow, non-potable well on
site.
BZA members took note of a letter in support from neighboring resident
Emerson and Deborah DeLaney. The variance was approved unanimously.