Nearly all the
hotels and motels in Porter County are in the cities and towns, but county
leaders appoint almost half of the board that oversees the county’s tourism
agency.
Porter County
Convention, Recreation and Visitor Commission members Jeff Good and Matt
Murphy say that appointment process is unfair and that the municipalities
should be given greater authority over the PCCRVC.
Currently, the
PCCRVC Board is made up of nine members, with three appointed by the Porter
County Commissioners and one appointed by the Porter County Council. The
remaining five are appointed by the municipalities, with two from Portage;
one from Valparaiso; one jointly appointed by Chesterton, Porter and Burns
Harbor; and one jointly appointed by Hebron and Kouts.
A proposal
that’s been discussed recently calls for shifting the appointment authority
away from the county to the municipalities.
“Why shouldn’t
Chesterton have more of a say than the county?” Murphy asked, noting that
the funding source for the PCCRVC comes from an innkeepers tax generated by
the hotels.
The proposal to
change the appointments of the PCCRVC came to light at Tuesday’s Porter
County Commissioner meeting, when Commissioner President Robert Harper spoke
out against last-minute special legislation. He said he heard that
legislation is planned in the current special session of the Indiana
Legislature to restructure the PCCRVC, but hasn’t been able to see a written
draft.
Both Good and
Murphy said the concept is nowhere near as far along as Harper made it
sound.
Both said that
they have been in discussions with State Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso,
about possible legislation, but that Soliday wanted to see more broad-based
support for the change, particularly from Portage. Good said while Portage
Mayor Olga Velazquez has been involved in the talks, she wants more
discussion about the idea.
“It’s dead,”
Good said about impending possible legislation. “As far as I’m concerned,
there’s nothing to talk about.”
Good said it was
unfair for Harper to use his leadership role and go on a “rant,” since the
proposal was nothing more than a concept that now has become “blown out of
proportion.”
“To me, it’s a
Bob Harper smokescreen,” he said.
Murphy, too,
said he’s heard many rumors that are blatantly untrue. He cited one rumor in
particular that the proposal is connected to a Lake County takeover of the
PCCRVC. He said while he supports partnerships with Lake County tourism when
appropriate, he also thinks Porter County should have its own tourism
agency.
“I’m not
comfortable being taken over,” he said.
Murphy said the
fear about a Lake County merger has become a distraction for the PCCRVC.
Changing the law that applies to the PCCRVC is one way to ensure that Porter
County keeps control, he said. “Whatever we do, I think we need to have
something protecting Porter County from Lake County.”
Both Good and
Murphy said they have heard from other people representing municipalities
and the business community who agree that the county has too much control
over the PCCRVC. Murphy said the concern is that municipalities use tax
abatements and Tax Increment Financing to attract new hotels, but aren’t
seeing a return on their investment from tourism.
Good, who owns a
hotel in Valparaiso and in Portage as part of his Good Hospitality Services,
said the PCCRVC has been in place for about 20 years and that during that
time, there have been no real changes to the enabling legislation.
Instead, he said
the PCCRVC has become a mechanism for the county commissioners to run
tourism in this county when in reality, the commissioners have little to do
with the industry. Good said that as hotelier, he’s more deeply involved in
the industry than the commissioners and that he knows that there are ways to
improve tourism in this county. But because of the control exerted at the
county level, he said the PCCRVC is blocked from functioning as it should.
He noted in particular that one of the commissioners’ appointments sat
vacant for about four months.
Good added that
hotels in Valparaiso contribute 40 percent of the innkeepers’ tax that funds
the PCCRVC but that Valparaiso gets very little in return from the agency.
“People who go
to the dunes do not go to Valparaiso,” he said.