If the Porter
County Council ends up rescinding the tax that has funded the county’s
participation in the Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority, would
cities and towns step in -- if they could -- to keep the county’s membership
in the RDA?
The answer from
several officials attending a Monday press conference in support of the RDA
appears to be “maybe.”
Cities and towns
in Porter County have the authority to pass a county option income tax.
Latest population figures show that the votes of the councils in Portage,
Valparaiso, Chesterton and Porter would be enough to establish a COIT
Council in Porter County. State law does allow pooling of local income tax
funds for specific purposes; however, it’s questionable if such a pooling of
funds for the RDA could be done under the current law.
After a press
conference Monday at which town and city officials called on county to stay
in the RDA, several officials were asked a hypothetical question about
whether the cities and towns would be willing to explore reinstating the RDA
income tax if the county council eventually rescinds it.
Valparaiso Mayor
Jon Costas, who is also an attorney, noted that the RDA statute doesn’t give
the municipalities that authority. He also agreed that there would be
hurdles to overcome if the cities and towns teamed up to pass a COIT for the
RDA.
However, he also
said that in the wake of the county’s decision to leave the RDA, there have
been some discussions about possibly changing legislation to transfer the
authority to join the RDA to the municipalities. But he also said any change
in the state law is totally a moving target; the current legislative session
is set to adjourn Wednesday.
In his opening
comments at Monday’s press conference, Costas noted that the five
municipalities in attendance represent more than 50 percent of Porter
County’s population and that most economic development projects occur in
cities and towns.
If
municipalities would either have, or be granted, the authority to keep the
county’s involvement in the RDA, Costas said he believes Valparaiso would
vote in support if it meant no change in the current tax structure, with the
first $3.5 million going toward the RDA and the rest toward property tax
relief in the form of a county homestead credit.
“I certainly
would vote for that,” he said.
Costas stressed
the importance of the county homestead credit in cutting taxes for
homeowners, particularly seniors and others who pay relatively little toward
the county income tax.
“The property
tax relief aspect of this is not insignificant,” he said.
When asked the
same question about the possibility of municipalities imposing a tax on
their own to keep the county in the RDA, if the county rescinds the current
tax, Porter Town Council President Michelle Bollinger said she believes the
town of Porter would support such a move if it meant no change in the
existing tax structure. She said the town would have to demonstrate to the
public the value of the RDA, but said that the RDA/homestead credit tax is
one tax that the public can see meaningful results.
Often, she said,
peole don’t know where their tax money is going. “So many taxes we pay --
poof -- they’re gone,” he said.
Portage Mayor
Olga Velazquez said she would oppose any new or additional taxes, but if the
county were to rescind the current RDA tax and municipalities would have the
power to reinstate it in order to keep the RDA, she said she believes that
would be worth considering.
The county
council voted 4-3 on April 8 to withdraw from the RDA but did not rescind
the 0.25 percent tax that was imposed in 2005 when the council first joined
the RDA with Lake County.
Council members
opted not to take action on the tax, at least not at the current time, due
to the unresolved legal questions. Council attorney Scott McClure warned
that if council rescinds the tax and later learns that it cannot legally
pull out of the RDA, the county might have to pay the $3.5 million RDA dues
with no funding mechanism. Council members said they would discuss the fate
of the RDA/homestead credit tax at a later date once the legal issues become
clearer.