Porter County taxpayers who calculated their 2010 property tax bills before
last week may find their actual tax bill slightly higher than what they
expected, under a revised budget order issued last week by the Indiana
Department of Local Government Finance.
The DLGF reissued the 2010 Porter County Budget after Porter County Auditor
Jim Kopp notified the state that the auditor’s office discovered the net
assessed values for Burns Harbor should have been $511 million, not $637
million as originally certified. The difference in figures was due to
property abatements for Mittal Steel that had not been deducted from the
total.
The new tax rates for Porter County’s 29 taxing districts all swelled
slightly with the revised county assessed value. Burns Harbor, as expected,
saw the biggest leap in its tax rate which grew .1319 of a percent compared
to the original budget order. Portage City-Westchester Township, which also
includes personal property from Mittal Steel, saw the second highest growth
with .0935 of a percent. The rates are determined by the taxing district’s
levy divided by the assessed value.
Kopp reported the error after Burns Harbor Treasurer-Clerk Jane Jordan at
the DLGF 1782 public hearing on Feb. 5 asked why the net assessed value for
her taxing district was 20 percent higher than last year.
Jordan said if the tax bills were issued incorrectly, Burns Harbor would
have seen shortfalls near $600,000 for the district.
Kopp said the error came from the Low and Associates Software System used by
both the assessor’s and the auditor’s office. He said the system used by the
assessor’s office was not compatible with the taxing portion of the system
used by the auditor. Kopp said he asked the county commissioners and county
council to purchase an integrated system, but the county instead purchased
the non-integrated Low system recommended by Porter County Assessor John
Scott.
Scott, who admitted there were major problems with tax data before Kopp took
office in 2007, said the Low system and XSoft purchased by the county in
2009 were up and running in his office within four weeks compared to the
Hamer system endorsed by Kopp which took 22 months.
“I knew it was a defunct company when they tried to put it in my office, I
knew it was a defunct office when they tried to put it in Jim’s,” said
Scott. “When it is ready to work in my office, I’ll accept it.”
Scott said the consultants hired by the county to fix the problems with the
Hamer told Kopp the only way taxing will get done is if the assessors have a
computer system that works. Scott said his office had spent nearly an
additional 2,000 hours without overtime figuring splits and transfers that
should have been done by the auditor’s office.
This is the first year the Low computer system has been used by the county
offices. Kopp said the computer system will be automated for next year’s
taxing process, eliminating many of the problems the auditor’s office had to
fix manually.
With the DLGF’s certification of the 2010 budget order, the remaining work
will be handled at the county level. Kopp said he will submit a tax abstract
to the state this week if his office does not discover other errors. Once
the state approves the abstract, the auditor’s office will begin calculating
the property tax bills.
The auditor will pass the bills along to Porter County Treasurer Mike Bucko,
who is to mail the bills by April 23 according to state law. The first
installment of the 2010 tax bills is due to the state by May 10 with a
second installment due in November.
Kopp said his office may have the tax bills ready by the first week of
April. The last time property tax bills were issued on time in Porter County
was in 2002.
The DLGF also reported that Porter County is the 62nd of the Indiana’s 92
counties to have the budget certified. As of today, 71 counties have been
issued their final budget orders.
Taxpayers can estimate their 2010 property tax bill at the DLGF’s Web site,
www.in.gov/dlgf, by using the online property tax calculator. Taxpayers
should also be advised that their true tax bill amount is to be determined
by the county.
Following below is a listing of the corrected 2010 District Taxing Rates
according to the Budget Order approved by the DLGF on Thursday. The tax rate
(the certified levy divided by assessed value) is expressed in terms of
“dollars per $100 of assessed value.”
District Taxing Rates
Boone Township- 2.2969
Hebron (Boone)- 2.8559
Center Township- 1.3672
Valparaiso (Center)- 2.2199
Jackson Township- 1.3789
Liberty Township- 1.4299
Chesterton-Liberty TWP- 2.1996
Morgan Township- 1.5730
Pine Township-Michigan City School District- 1.6267
Pine Township-Duneland School District- 1.4267
Beverly Shores (Pines)- 1.8900
Pines Town (Pines Twp.)- 1.9964
Pleasant Township- 1.6432
Kouts (Pleasant)- 2.0083
Portage Township- 1.8255
Portage City-Portage TWP- 2.4792
Ogden Dunes (Portage)- 1.8913
Porter Township- 1.5175
Union Township- 1.5020
Washington Township- 1.6082
Westchester Township- 1.4703
Portage City- Westchester Township- 2.4097
Chesterton- Westchester Township- 2.2586
Burns Harbor (Westchester)- 1.7884
Dune Acres (Westchester)- 1.7433
Porter Town (Westchester)- 2.3534
Chesterton-Jackson Twp.- 2.1833
Porter Twp.-W Porter Fire- 1.4939
Valparaiso-Washington Twp.- 2.5325