Chesterton Tribune

NPS seeking comments on Porter Brickyard Trail environmental assessment

Back to Front Page
 

 

 
 

 

 

The National Park Service (NPS) has released the draft Porter Brickyard Trail Environmental Assessment for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore and is seeking public comment.

Each unit of the national park system is driven by federal enabling legislation and this assessment is needed to ensure that the Porter Brickyard Trail, when built, is in harmony with the legislative intent of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore.

The Porter Brickyard Environmental Assessment evaluates three possible alternatives in depth. These alternatives explore a range of options for the route of the trail through the National Lakeshore, so that park purposes and objectives are met, park resources protected, and impacts minimized. All alternatives are consistent with applicable NPS laws, policies, and regulations.

A written copy of the Porter Brickyard Trail Environmental Assessment is available in three different formats: •At http://parkplanning.nps.gov/indu

•A CD of the document. Write Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Attention: Eric Ehn, Management Assistant, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road Porter, Indiana 46304-1299.

•Hard copies of the document are also available for review at the Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center at Indiana Route 49 and US Highway 20; and at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Headquarters at 1100 North Mineral Springs Road in Porter, Indiana.

The best way to comment on the Environmental Assessment is to use the electronic form located at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/indu.

The comment period closed on Oct. 17 and comments must be postmarked no later than Oct. 17.

If you cannot use the electronic form, you may mail or drop off a hard copy comment form and/or letter to: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Attention: Eric Ehn, Management Assistant, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road Porter, Indiana 46304-1299.

The Environmental Assessment has three alternatives under consideration.

•Alternative A (No Action): No new multi-use trail will be developed.

•Alternative B: The Field-Forest Route.

•Alternative C: Locate the trail along road rights of way.

Each alternative addresses the potential environmental impacts to the park’s historic structures; cultural landscapes; archeological resources; soils, air, and water quality; vegetation; wildlife and wildlife habitat; sensitive and rare species; recreation resources; visitor use and experience; park operations; and socioeconomic conditions.

The preferred alternative, Alternative B, proposes a route which would avoid a forested wetland north of Oak Hill Road and would place the trail in the old field west of park headquarters. The route would continue north and re-enter the woods in an area which bypasses the wetland and larger old tress. It would then continue north from there to U.S. Highway 12 and to the Calumet Trail.

Alternative B is “preferred because it would best protect the integrity of the natural resources, while providing for a multi-use trail benefiting the broadest range of park visitors,” NPS said.

 

Posted 9/19/2011