Save the Dunes is asking the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(IDEM) to toughen the conditions of NIPSCO’s National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit for its Bailly Generating Station, whose
outfall effluent crosses several hundred feet of beach at Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore.
In comments submitted to IDEM on June 11, Save the Dunes made note in
particular of several issues:
•The Bailly Generating Station’s outfall across a beach to which the public
has access and where folks “participate in full-body contact and recreation
with the effluent stream” is “of serious public health concern.” Save the
Dunes believes that “the public is put at risk by this effluent stream from
the release of toxic substances and high-water temperatures which could
occur due to equipment malfunction or routine operations.”
•The beach in question is also “known to provide a habitat for the Piping
Plover”—an endangered bird “under the U.S. Endangered Species Act”—during
migration. “It is expected that the beach could one day provide habitat for
breeding populations of the bird but further restoration is needed.”
•Save the Dunes expresses as well its fear that the draft NPDES permit
submitted by NIPSCO “will not adequately address possible PCB and mercury
contamination from the facility.”
Save the Dunes is thus asking IDEM to make the NPDES permit more stringent
in a number of ways. First, the permit should formally establish a deadline
for implementation of a NIPSCO plan—involving a system of sheet pile banks
and bank fencing—to contain the outfall across the National Lakeshore beach.
“NIPSCO specifically should be responsible that the route of the effluent
does not cross (the National Lakeshore’s) beach and that adequate signage
and/or physical barriers protect the public from direct contact with the
undiluted effluent.”
Second, although Save the Dunes notes that there have been no violations of
NIPSCO’s “streamlined mercury variance limit” granted by IDEM in 2011, more
frequent monitoring for mercury should be considered and additional measures
required for “employee awareness and education and accidental release
prevention.”
Third, at a minimum annual testing of PCBs should be required by the NPDES
permit.
Fourth, the need for a “monitoring regime for aluminum” should be assessed.
Finally, NIPSCO should be required to release to the public, in its
entirely, the Bailly Generating Station’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan.
Save the Dunes did make a point, in its submission to IDEM, to thank NIPSCO
“for meeting with us to discuss the permit in detail as we prepared our
comments.”
NIPSCO
“Save the Dunes,
as well as IDEM and (the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), are an
important part of the permit renewal process and we’re working together on a
solution that best protects the public and environment,” said NIPSCO
spokesman Nick Meyer. “This is very much a collaborative process, taking
into account input from all parties, and we’re reaching a consensus.”
“Save the Dunes’
filed comments make reference to their belief that our plan would adequately
protect the public,” Meyer added. “We’re all in agreement regarding the
short-term plan for additional signage and we’re working together on a plan
to properly and effectively add physical barriers.”
On the subject
of outflow, Meyer said, “Discussions are ongoing about the best way to
effectively address that issue and identify a sustainable solution.”
Meyer did
observe that, since the current mercury rules have been in effect, NIPSCO
has “never been in violation” of them. “We’re continuing to ratchet down
(the mercury levels) and we have among the lowest levels along the lake—so
much that we’re very close to background levels that already exist.”
Finally, Meyer
said, NIPSCO is “sensitive” to the Piping Plover issue. “Save the Dunes
expects that the beach could one day provide a habitat for Piping Plover but
restoration is required. We want to be part of that solution and it’s part
of our plan.”
Posted 6/26/2012