By ERICA WERNER
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday that
current smog standards don’t sufficiently protect public health and proposed
tightening them for the first time in a decade.
The agency proposed reducing levels of ground-level ozone — the major smog
component — from the current .08 parts per million to between .070 and .075
parts per million.
The EPA will take public comment for 90 days and settle on a final number by
March 12, 2008. However, it also is soliciting comments on alternative
standards, including keeping the current one or going down to .060 parts per
million.
The EPA’s decision to take comments on keeping the current standard was
decried by environmentalists but welcomed by business and industry groups
that have been lobbying for the status quo, saying changing ozone standards
would be costly and unnecessary.
“Based upon the current science I have concluded that the current standard is
insufficient to protect public health,” EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
told reporters on a conference call, noting that ozone can harm the lungs,
especially in children and old people, and aggravate asthma.
Johnson was asked repeatedly to explain why he would accept comment on
keeping a standard that he himself, a career scientist, has determined
doesn’t protect health.
“Based upon the science, I do not believe there is scientific justification
for retaining the current standard. Hence I am proposing to toughen the
standard,” he said. “But I am taking comment on the full range of what I have
heard people ask for.”
Environmental groups charged that the outcome was the result of industry
pressure on the Bush administration.
“This suggests that recent polluter visits to the White House helped shape
this decision. It raises huge concerns about what EPA will do with its final
decision,” said Frank O’Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, an
environmental group. “Why leave the door open to doing something you know is
wrong — unless that came from political pressure?”
Johnson didn’t respond directly when asked about environmentalists’
allegations about industry lobbying. He repeated that he’s concluded that the
current standard is insufficient.
The National Association of Manufacturers was among business groups that
issued statements Thursday saying they’d be advocating for retaining the
current standard.
“We recognize that the EPA has a duty to protect public health, and studies
have shown implementing the current standard will do just that,” NAM
President John Engler said. “Even though a lot has been done and spent, there
is still a long way to go to meeting the current standard. Therefore we see
no reason to revise the current standard.”
Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is supposed to review standards on ozone and
other pollutants every five years. When that didn’t happen five years ago, a
lawsuit by the American Lung Association resulted in a settlement between EPA
and advocacy groups to propose revised levels for smog. Thursday was the
deadline for that proposal to be offered.
According to EPA, 104 counties are out of compliance with the current
standard. If the standard went to .075 parts per million 398 counties would
be out of compliance, and if it went to .070 parts per million 533 counties
would be out of compliance.
States with noncompliance areas must come up with implementation plans to
come into attainment or face a loss of federal highway funds. Most of the
problem areas are in California, Texas, the Atlanta area, the Northeast, the
mid-Atlantic and the Upper Midwest.
Posted 6/21/2007