Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore is one of 25 national parks identified as
being most threatened by climate change in a study conducted jointly by the
Natural Resources Defense Council and the Rocky Mountain Climate
Organization.
The study, released on Thursday, characterizes the National Lakeshore as
“vulnerable to a loss of ice and snow, a loss of water, more downpours and
floods, a loss of plant communities, a loss of wildlife, more crowding, a
loss of fishing, and more air pollution”: all the consequences of climate
change caused by “human activities” resulting in “the emission of
heat-trapping gases.”
Loss of Ice and
Snow
Global warming very likely will decrease opportunities for snow-dependent
outdoor winter recreation in national parks, including Indiana Dunes, where
the snowshoeing and cross-country skiing season is already getting shorter,
in the face of the almost 4 degree Fahrenheit increase in average
temperatures in the Upper Great Lakes region in the 20th century,” the study
states.
Loss of Water
“In the Upper Midwest, the water level of the Great Lakes is likely to
fall,” the study states. “Scientists project that Great Lake levels could
fall by as much as several feet by 2090.
In the Great Lakes parks, fixed docks and boat ramps could be too high,
deeper-draft boats could lose access to docks and anchorages, and drying
wetlands on lake edges could affect habitat and food for fish and birds.”
More Downpours
and Floods
“With a changed climate, more precipitation comes in downpours,” the study
states. “The amount of rain falling in heavy storms increased by 20 percent
over the past century, while there has been little change in the amount from
light and moderate storms. . . . With an increase in downpours, flooding is
also likely to increase. Virtually all national parks in Indiana and
elsewhere are at risk.”
Loss of Plant
Communities
“Indiana Dunes has an astonishing diversity of plants, with more than 1,100
flowering plants,” the study states. “The park is already struggling with
invasive plant species that threaten the local ecosystems, a problem which
could be worsened by an altered climate.”
Loss of Wildlife
A “changed climate could mean less of the wildlife species now in the
parks,” the study states. “Some species may go completely extinct and local
populations in particular parks may be eliminated or decline sharply.
At Indiana Dunes, numbers of Karner blue butterflies, an endangered species,
have declined in years of low snow cover, thought to be from a loss of
protection that snow provides for over-wintering eggs.”
More
Overcrowding
“As temperatures soar with a change in climate, to escape oppressive heat
enough people may flock to cooler northern parks and to national lakeshores
to overcrowd them,” the statement said. “Overcrowding could be a significant
problem particularly for those parks that offer a break from the heat and
are close to major population centers, including Indiana Dunes with beaches
just a few miles from Gary and about 2 million visitors each year.”
Loss of Fishing
A “changed climate threaten to reduce fish populations and recreational fish
opportunities in the parks,” the study states. “At Indiana Dunes fishing for
Chinook and coho salmon and trout could be affected if, as projected, warmer
temperatures reduce salmon and trout populations.”
More Air
Pollution
“Because future climate-change driven increases in ozone levels are expected
to be greatest where ozone levels already are high, the Lakeshore is at risk
of continued, perhaps worsened, levels of unhealthful air,” the study
states.
Other Parks and
Recommendations
Other parks
threatened by climate change, according to the study, include Everglades,
Acadia, Great Smoky Mountains, Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Joshua Tree.
The study
recommends 32 actions to preserve these national parks, among them the
creation of new ones and the expansion of existing ones; the promotion
beyond park boundaries of preservation efforts; and the adoption by the
National Park Service of becoming climate-neutral in its own operations
within parks.
In addition, the
federal government “must take three essential steps,” the study states:
enacting comprehensive mandatory limits on global warming pollution;
overcoming barriers to investment in energy efficiency; and accelerating the
development of clean energy technologies.