

A steel slab (top) becomes a plate (bottom) at the ISG Burns Harbor 110” Plate Mill
(Photos provided)
By KEVIN NEVERS
After nearly five years in moth balls, the 110-inch plate mill at
International Steel Group (ISG)-Burns Harbor is back in business.
On Wednesday ISG restarted the mill, in a move which the company says was
demand driven. “We couldn’t be more pleased with the successful restart of
this facility,” said Thomas Cera, vice-president of plate operations. “Our
decision to return this mill to operation was driven by increasing demand
from our existing customers and our desire to quickly respond to their
needs.”
Bethlehem Steel Corporation idled the 110-inch mill in August 2000, less
than 15 months before it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. At the
time Bethlehem officials spoke of the idling as though it were a short-term
response to a temporary softening of the plate market, caused by
third-quarter doldrums and a spike in foreign imports, but in the end the
110-inch mill remained shuttered for good.
ISG spokesperson Jolice Pojeta told the Chesterton Tribune today that the
primary market for the 110-inch mill is original equipment manufacturers—or
OEMs—like Caterpillar, John Deere, and Union Tank Car. But it also produces
a healthy quantity of armor plate used by the U.S. Navy’s shipbuilding
contractors. And much of the plate—military grade included—is of the
value-added variety: heat-treated for fracture resistance and greater
formability.
In an interview with the Tribune in January, Cera noted that on paper the
restart of the 110-inch mill will give ISG an additional 200,000 tons or so
of annual plate capacity. In fact, though, shortly after the company
acquired U.S. Steel Corporation’s 160-inch mill at Gary Works—in a straight
swap for the No. 2 pickle line at Indiana Harbor Works—ISG idled it. Now
only the heat-treating facility at Gary Works is being used, to supplement
not only the Burns Harbor heat-treating facility but the Coatesville and
Conshohocken, Pa., facilities. And when the 160-inch mill at Gary Works was
idled, in October 2003, ISG took off line around 750,000 tons of annual
plate capacity, Cera said.
Among other things, Cera told the Tribune in January, the restart of the
110-inch mill gives ISG a great deal more flexibility in its production of
plate. Much of the plate produced by the 160-inch mill can also be produced
on the 110-inch mill, he said, and it’s simply more efficient to make a
96-inch wide length of plate on the 110-inch than on the 160-inch.
Cera also told the Tribune in January that the restart of the 110-inch mill
was made much easier by the “great job shutting it down” done by Bethlehem’s
employees. “They deserve to be commended,” he said. “They did a fantastic
job when it was idled.”
New Jobs
The restart of the 110-inch mill created 65 new jobs, said Paul Gibson,
president of United Steelworkers of America (USWA) Local 6787, all of them
filled by relatives of bargaining unit employees, under the union’s
collective bargaining agreement with ISG. Another 35 or so members are also
working at the 110-inch mill after successfully bidding for positions there.
First preference for bids went to members employed at the 160-inch mill, and
bidding was then opened to members on a plant-wide basis.
Ironically enough, if anyone had asked Gipson only two months before ISG
announced the restart of the 110-inch mill, he would have questioned the
wisdom of that move, given the fragmentation of the domestic plate industry
and a weak market for the product.
But a lot can happen in two months, Gipson said this morning. For one thing,
a weak U.S. dollar has dampened foreign imports. For another, soaring demand
in China for steel of all kinds has spiked the price of high carbon plate to
virtually unprecedented levels. Only two years ago it was in the
neighborhood of $350 per ton, he remarked. Now it’s going for $800 to $900
per ton.
The impending merger of ISG with Mittal Steel Company, however, has also
strengthened the case for the restart. When Bethlehem was making its
last-gasp efforts to preserve its autonomy, it sold many of its assets,
especially energy-related ones, and lost much of its old vertical
organization, Gipson said. The result: ISG has been paying “a tremendous
price” for coal, scrap, and other raw materials.
Lakshmi Mittal, on the other hand—who with his family will hold 88 percent
of the new company when the merger with ISG closes sometime in the next few
weeks—“brings to the table a lot of resources for making steel that he
already owns,” Gipson remarked. Those resources include over 40 percent
captive source of iron ore and 2 billion tons of reserves, according to an
investor presentation prepared by Mittal in October 2004; a “significant
captive source” of coal and more than 1.5 billion tons of reserves; and more
than 15 million tons of production capacity of coke, enough to meet 100
percent of the company’s needs.
The upshot, in Gipson’s view: the restart of the 110-inch mill “is a good
thing. It should have a very good market.”
Posted 4/8/2005